CNN
 — 

The Supreme Court docket upheld a pro-Republican South Carolina congressional map Thursday, rejecting the argument raised by civil rights teams that lawmakers impermissibly used race as a proxy to bolster the GOP’s possibilities.

However the excessive courtroom additionally stated that the civil rights teams that challenged the maps may proceed to pursue one a part of their declare, a transfer that can possible delay the battle over the districts for months.

With state election deadlines approaching, a federal courtroom in March had already dominated that South Carolina may use the contested map on this yr’s election.

The choice was 6-3 alongside conservative-liberal strains.

“The circumstantial proof falls far in need of exhibiting that race, not partisan preferences, drove the districting course of, and not one of the professional reviews provided by the Challengers gives any vital help for his or her place,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote within the majority opinion.

The Supreme Court docket has beforehand stated that it’s going to not evaluate partisan gerrymanders – that’s, maps meant to offer one occasion a bonus over the opposite. In creating these benefits, nevertheless, mapmakers are barred from relying predominately on race as they transfer voters from one district to a different. The problem is that race and occasion affiliation typically align, and so it may be troublesome to disentangle one from the opposite.

Liberal Justice Elena Kagan wrote in a prolonged dissent joined by the opposite two liberals arguing that almost all will give state lawmakers and mapmakers “an incentive to make use of race as a proxy to attain partisan ends.”

“Go proper forward, this Court docket says to States right this moment. Go forward, although you don’t have any acknowledged justification for utilizing race, corresponding to to adjust to statutes making certain equal voting rights,” Kagan wrote. “Go forward, although you’re (at finest) utilizing race as a short-cut to result in partisan features – to elect extra Republicans in a single case, extra Democrats in one other.”

She continued: “Within the electoral sphere particularly, the place ‘ugly patterns of pervasive racial discrimination’ have so lengthy ruled, we must always demand higher – of ourselves, of our political representatives, and most of all of this Court docket.”

This story has been up to date with extra particulars.