CNN
 — 

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, probably the most senior liberal on the conservative Supreme Court docket, instructed an viewers at Harvard College on Friday that she typically cries after the courtroom palms down its choices – and he or she urged there could also be extra tears forward.

“There are days that I’ve come to my workplace after an announcement of a case and closed my door and cried,” Sotomayor instructed the Radcliffe Institute for Superior Examine at Harvard College, the place she obtained an award Friday. “There have been these days. And there are more likely to be extra.”

Sotomayor made the remarks because the Supreme Court docket turns towards the ultimate weeks of a time period by which the justices will resolve quite a lot of high-profile controversies, together with former President Donald Trump’s declare of immunity from federal election subversion costs and two main circumstances coping with abortion.

The courtroom is about at hand down these choices and dozens of others by the tip of June. Sotomayor didn’t talk about particular circumstances in her remarks.

Sotomayor has beforehand mentioned her “frustration” with the courtroom’s route. Talking on the College of California, Berkeley College of Legislation earlier this yr, she mentioned she lived with that frustration and that “each loss really traumatizes me in my abdomen and in my coronary heart.”

“However I’ve to rise up the following morning and carry on preventing,” she mentioned.

However her remarks, whereas typically upbeat, have been additionally extra poignant on Friday.

“There are moments after I’m deeply, deeply unhappy,” she mentioned at Harvard. “And there are moments when, sure, even I really feel desperation. All of us do. However you need to personal it. You must settle for it. You must shed the tears, after which you need to wipe them and rise up and battle some extra.”

As typically occurs this time of yr, a lot of the opinions the courtroom has issued have been unanimous – or have cut up alongside non-ideological traces. However that’s partly as a result of the courtroom tends to deal with much less controversial points first and cope with probably the most politically or legally fraught opinions on the finish of June.

In latest phrases, the courtroom has issued a number of landmark choices which have damaged alongside ideological – or close to ideological – traces, together with the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022, a call that very same yr that expanded gun rights and a ruling final yr that gutted affirmative motion insurance policies in faculty admissions.

Earlier this week, Sotomayor joined a sharply worded dissent authored by Justice Elena Kagan in a main redistricting case. The courtroom upheld a pro-Republican congressional map in South Carolina and rejected an argument from civil rights teams and a decrease courtroom that lawmakers impermissibly used race as a proxy to bolster the GOP’s possibilities.

The choice was 6-3 alongside conservative-liberal traces.