Washington
CNN
—
Vice President Kamala Harris usually touts how she took on the “large banks” as lawyer common of California to ship mortgage aid to householders hit by the 2008 foreclosures disaster. The story has turn out to be central to the best way Harris introduces herself to voters.
It’s talked about in TV advertisements and at many marketing campaign stops. She additionally spoke about it throughout her speech on the Democratic Nationwide Conference in August.
“As lawyer common of California, I took on the large banks, delivered $20 billion for middle-class households who confronted foreclosures and helped move a Home-owner Invoice of Rights, one of many first of its variety within the nation,” she stated.
The oft-repeated story references how Harris helped negotiate a multistate mortgage settlement with 5 of the nation’s largest banks that delivered monetary aid to householders and set requirements for lenders. Harris additionally secured a separate settlement with three of the banks, guaranteeing a specific amount of aid for California householders. Each offers have been signed in 2012.
Harris has been retelling the story all through her political profession. A chapter in her 2019 ebook, “The Truths We Maintain,” describes her position within the settlement negotiations. And it has come up when Harris talks about her connection with President Joe Biden’s late son, Beau Biden, who was then the lawyer common of Delaware and likewise signed onto the nationwide mortgage settlement.
When Harris turned California lawyer common in 2011, many states and several other federal businesses had already been investigating abusive lending practices akin to robo-signing, when banks routinely signed foreclosure-related paperwork with out understanding if the info have been appropriate.
On the time, the US housing market was in disarray and People have been defaulting on their mortgages and falling sufferer to foreclosures at extraordinarily excessive charges.
Within the fall of 2011, Harris walked away from the negotiations, claiming the proposed settlement was “insufficient for California householders.”
In her ebook, Harris recounts how she determined to talk on to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon over the telephone in regards to the negotiations, a dialog that turned heated. The nationwide settlement was finalized simply weeks later.
The episode turned a career-defining second for Harris. A press launch her workplace issued on the time stated that earlier than she had left the talks, California was anticipated to obtain simply $4 billion from the nationwide settlement.
“I believe she did maintain out, and I believe she improved the settlement because it pertained to California householders,” stated Ira Rheingold, government director of the Nationwide Affiliation of Shopper Advocates.
Because of the nationwide settlement, mortgage aid was delivered to householders in a number of totally different varieties, akin to principal reductions, rates of interest cuts, different kinds of mortgage modifications or brief gross sales. There have been additionally some direct funds despatched to individuals who wrongfully misplaced their properties to foreclosures, in accordance with the Nationwide Mortgage Settlement web site.
Harris appointed a monitor – now-US Rep. Katie Porter, who was on the time a legislation professor on the College of California, Irvine – to verify the banks complied with the phrases.
The California settlement delivered about $9.2 billion to greater than 84,000 householders by lowering the principal on their first or second mortgages, in accordance with Porter’s 2013 report.
One other $9.2 billion went to brief gross sales. Brief gross sales don’t permit a household to remain of their house however do permit a house owner to promote for lower than the property is value. If a lender approves a brief sale, it agrees to forgive the distinction.
The outcomes allowed many households to remain of their properties, however in hindsight, wasn’t good.
“There was much less principal discount completed right here than ought to have been completed. That has quite a bit to do with the best way this (settlement) bought structured,” Rheingold stated.
New requirements for mortgage lenders
The settlement additionally set new servicing requirements for mortgage lenders that, on the time, didn’t exist on a nationwide stage.
“From my vantage level, the true worth of the settlement was that it launched the primary broad set of servicing requirements for large banks and lenders,” stated Lisa Sitkin, supervising lawyer on the Nationwide Housing Legislation Mission.
Sitkin stated that in earlier years, it felt just like the “Wild West” as a result of there have been no guidelines to guard debtors after they have been going by means of the foreclosures course of.
The settlement, for instance, put restrictions on a follow generally known as “twin monitoring,” throughout which a mortgage servicer continued the foreclosures course of whereas a struggling borrower was making use of for a mortgage modification.
The brand new tips have been a precursor to federal rules later created by the Shopper Monetary Safety Bureau.
The requirements additionally helped pave the best way for the California state legislature to move a Home-owner Invoice of Rights, creating extra protections for householders.
“It was solely when then-AG Harris put the load of her workplace behind the efforts that we have been capable of get a Home-owner Invoice of Rights handed right here in California,” stated Sitkin, who together with different advocates had spent years pushing for state requirements.
